| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Sameer Thakur <samthakur74(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_stat_statements: calls under-estimation propagation |
| Date: | 2013-12-08 15:45:03 |
| Message-ID: | 1386517503.31519.5.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, 2013-12-07 at 16:00 -0800, Peter Geoghegan wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 3:50 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> > 32-bit buildfarm members are having problems with this patch.
>
> This should fix that problem. Thanks.
This is incidentally the same problem that was reported here about
another pg_stat_statements patch:
http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/BF2827DCCE55594C8D7A8F7FFD3AB7713DDAC54F@SZXEML508-MBX.china.huawei.com
Can we make this more robust so that we don't accidentally keep breaking
32-bit systems? Maybe a static assert?
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-12-08 15:51:09 | Re: CLUSTER FREEZE |
| Previous Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2013-12-08 11:43:11 | Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node) |