Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?

From: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
Date: 2013-10-04 18:09:03
Message-ID: CAM3SWZQUqGMi3W5ot-vFXvaJrWG-rF04wJikPj==5Wag7Tj4AQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 6:44 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I think we were going to try to group the extensions into categories
> (debugging tools, demonstration code, data types, etc.) and maybe
> encourage packagers to put the debugging tools in the same OS package
> as the core server.

I was thinking more about different extension tiers, grouping them by
quality/usefulness.

--
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-04 19:15:36 Re: mvcc catalo gsnapshots and TopTransactionContext
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-10-04 18:05:55 Re: insert throw error when year field len > 4 for timestamptz datatype