Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Sergey Konoplev <gray(dot)ru(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Any reasons to not move pgstattuple to core?
Date: 2013-10-04 13:44:02
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZr7F_gNV4W_ubA4kjhHzDkE_iEkZMawyRiPXKk9_1BKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 3, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> Greg Smith made a list some months ago of contrib modules that were
>> essential for forensics analysis and such. Weren't we going to do
>> something special about those?
>
> It was more like two years ago. I do still think that that kind of
> effort makes a lot of sense.

I think we were going to try to group the extensions into categories
(debugging tools, demonstration code, data types, etc.) and maybe
encourage packagers to put the debugging tools in the same OS package
as the core server. But Tom was not supportive, and he was at the
time the packager for Red Hat, so it didn't seem like we were going to
get to far with it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-10-04 13:57:41 Re: [RFC] Extend namespace of valid guc names
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-10-04 13:40:08 Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax