| From: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Daniel O'Connor" <darius(at)dons(dot)net(dot)au>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max |
| Date: | 2014-06-05 01:28:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAJrrPGeuVMhJQjLHV7uboZHh7uOtgPSWjxeTZ3ktKf5c-jTUJA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:12 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-06-04 10:37:48 +1000, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
>> Thanks for the test. Patch is re-based to the latest head.
>
> Did you look at the source of the conflict? Did you intentionally mark
> the functions as leakproof and reviewed that that truly is the case? Or
> was that caused by copy & paste?
Yes it is copy & paste mistake. I didn't know much about that parameter.
Thanks for the information. I changed it.
Regards,
Hari Babu
Fujitsu Australia
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| inet_agg_v4.patch | application/octet-stream | 6.5 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sandro Santilli | 2014-06-05 05:58:56 | Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-05 00:14:24 | Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2014-06-05 01:57:58 | Re: slotname vs slot_name |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2014-06-05 01:08:22 | Re: tests for client programs |