| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Keith Fiske <keith(at)omniti(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel O'Connor <darius(at)dons(dot)net(dot)au>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [BUGS] BUG #9652: inet types don't support min/max |
| Date: | 2014-06-04 23:12:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20140604231214.GN785@awork2.anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On 2014-06-04 10:37:48 +1000, Haribabu Kommi wrote:
> Thanks for the test. Patch is re-based to the latest head.
Did you look at the source of the conflict? Did you intentionally mark
the functions as leakproof and reviewed that that truly is the case? Or
was that caused by copy & paste?
Greetings,
Andres Freund
--
Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-04 23:27:54 | Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2014-06-04 23:10:49 | Re: uninterruptable loop: concurrent delete in progress within table |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2014-06-04 23:15:13 | Re: Sigh, we need an initdb |
| Previous Message | Ali Akbar | 2014-06-04 23:11:37 | Re: "pivot aggregation" with a patched intarray |