From: | David Rowley <dgrowley(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
Date: | 2015-03-22 05:27:10 |
Message-ID: | CAHoyFK-DQh_Uf7hb4jKBrr2nDufpFdRkskapTyzwjQV=AP7qJg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 22 March 2015 at 18:17, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> >> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm thinks.
> >
> > jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it.
>
> All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference
> is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00.
>
It looks like there's some other problems there too, but for the
exponential issue, I posted a patch here:
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-03-22 05:42:56 | Re: Zero-padding and zero-masking fixes for to_char(float) |
Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2015-03-22 05:22:25 | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |