| From: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
| Date: | 2015-03-22 05:22:25 |
| Message-ID: | CAB7nPqQ_nkK=r2-P0qzCFYFggVX3gFQ9KU2DNF3u6VsqRKNNuQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 2:17 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 12:32 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>>> Pushed with that additional change. Let's see if the buildfarm thinks.
>>
>> jacana, apparently alone among buildfarm members, does not like it.
>
> All the windows nodes don't pass tests with this patch, the difference
> is in the exponential precision: e+000 instead of e+00.
Useless noise from my side, the error is in the test windows.sql like here:
http://buildfarm.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=jacana&dt=2015-03-21%2003%3A01%3A21
--
Michael
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2015-03-22 05:27:10 | Re: Using 128-bit integers for sum, avg and statistics aggregates |
| Previous Message | Andrew Gierth | 2015-03-22 05:19:52 | Re: INT64_MIN and _MAX |