| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp |
| Date: | 2011-10-04 12:05:29 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwGw1O2q3-3-AUdNNmedYofb=ppJubn4FKSQmwahQdutBQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry, but I still don't really think it's fair to say that you've
>>> proposed a solution to this problem. Or if you have, neither I nor
>>> Fujii Masao understand that proposal well enough to decide whether we
>>> like it.
>>
>> Arguing between trenches doesn't really get us anywhere.
>>
>> As ever, when someone claims to have a better solution then it is up
>> to them to prove that is the case.
>
> So... are you going to do that?
Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be
happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours.
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alexander Korotkov | 2011-10-04 12:10:40 | Re: Double sorting split patch |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2011-10-04 11:52:59 | Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp |