Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:05 PM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:33 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Sorry, but I still don't really think it's fair to say that you've
>>>> proposed a solution to this problem.  Or if you have, neither I nor
>>>> Fujii Masao understand that proposal well enough to decide whether we
>>>> like it.
>>>
>>> Arguing between trenches doesn't really get us anywhere.
>>>
>>> As ever, when someone claims to have a better solution then it is up
>>> to them to prove that is the case.
>>
>> So... are you going to do that?
>
> Simon, could you? If your proposal turns out to be better than mine, I'd be
> happy to agree to drop my patch and adopt yours.

Yes, will do.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services