| From: | Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Date: | 2013-07-03 18:26:45 |
| Message-ID: | CAHGQGwGmaHgJHap+84kDOMuOn5WJqZKgRXc_CEmP-snq_NJ8LA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:41 AM, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 4, 2013 at 2:36 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> On 2013-07-04 02:32:32 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>>> > Wouldn't it make more sense to fetch the toast index oid in the query
>>> > ontop instead of making a query for every relation?
>
> +1
> I changed the query that way. Updated version of the patch attached.
>
> Also I updated the rules.out because Michael changed the system_views.sql.
> Otherwise, the regression test would fail.
>
> Will commit this patch.
Committed. So, let's get to REINDEX CONCURRENTLY patch!
Regards,
--
Fujii Masao
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-07-03 18:28:50 | Re: Redesigning checkpoint_segments |
| Previous Message | Cédric Villemain | 2013-07-03 18:24:23 | Re: [9.4 CF 1] The Commitfest Slacker List |