Re: PL/pgSQL PERFORM with CTE

2013/8/20 David E. Wheeler <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>

> On Aug 20, 2013, at 3:05 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
>
> > When you would to ignore result, then you should to use a PERFORM -
> actually, it is limited now and should be fixed. Have no problem with it.
>
> Glad to have you on board. :-)
>
> > I don't would to enable a free unbound statement that returns result.
>
> I have no pony in that race. I think it is useful, though I prefer to unit
> test things enough that I would be fine without it.
>
> But even without it, there may be times when I want to discard a result in
> a function that *does* return a value -- likely a different value. So there
> needs to be a way to distinguish statements that should return a value and
> those that do not.
>

can you show some examples, please

Pavel

> Best,
>
> David
>
>