| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement |
| Date: | 2014-09-06 18:01:55 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRCaYy4ma01y_K+S+cUT17XKJDYebAazdohpACSXg462_w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-06 19:59 GMT+02:00 Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>:
> On 2014-09-06 7:49 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> this doesn't to supply assertions, it is just shorter form
>>
>
> The original proposal very clearly seems to be "why don't we do this
> *instead* of assertions?" And in that case all of my points apply, and I'm
> very much against this syntax. If this is supposed to be in the language
> *in addition to* assertions, let's please be clear about that. (In that
> case I wouldn't object, though I probably wouldn't use this feature either.)
It was just my reaction to Jan proposal in this thread.
pavel
>
>
> .marko
>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-06 18:08:40 | Improving PL/PgSQL (was: Re: plpgsql defensive mode) |
| Previous Message | Marko Tiikkaja | 2014-09-06 17:59:44 | Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement |