Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement

From: Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement
Date: 2014-09-06 17:59:44
Message-ID: 540B4B90.80107@joh.to
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2014-09-06 7:49 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> this doesn't to supply assertions, it is just shorter form

The original proposal very clearly seems to be "why don't we do this
*instead* of assertions?" And in that case all of my points apply, and
I'm very much against this syntax. If this is supposed to be in the
language *in addition to* assertions, let's please be clear about that.
(In that case I wouldn't object, though I probably wouldn't use this
feature either.)

.marko

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2014-09-06 18:01:55 Re: proposal: plpgsql - Assert statement
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2014-09-06 17:56:09 Re: plpgsql defensive mode