| From: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements |
| Date: | 2013-03-01 20:11:13 |
| Message-ID: | CAFj8pRB1TdM2GcWiVYceCKy+8CZUK_CPDEdih5wciumRyMk4dQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
2013/2/27 Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>:
> * Pavel Stehule (pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> I don't agree so it works well - you cannot use short type names is
>> significant issue
>
> This is for psql. In what use-case do you see that being a serious
> limitation?
>
> I might support having psql be able to fall-back to checking if the
> function name is unique (or perhaps doing that first before going on to
> look at the function arguments) but I don't think this should all be
> punted to the backend where only 9.3+ would have any real support for a
> capability which already exists in other places and should be trivially
> added to these.
a functionality can be same - only error message will be little bit different
>
> Thanks,
>
> Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2013-03-01 21:32:19 | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2013-03-01 19:42:24 | Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY |