Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Support for REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2013-03-01 21:32:19
Message-ID: 51311E63.3000905@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

REINDEX CONCURRENTLY resets the statistics in pg_stat_user_indexes,
whereas plain REINDEX does not. I think they should be preserved in
either case.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2013-03-01 21:48:02 Re: sql_drop Event Trigger
Previous Message Pavel Stehule 2013-03-01 20:11:13 Re: bugfix: --echo-hidden is not supported by \sf statements