Re: New pg_lsn type doesn't have hash/btree opclasses

On Tue, May 6, 2014 at 8:25 PM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 7, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
wrote:
> > Uh. They're different:
> >
> > Datum
> > timestamp_hash(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
> > {
> > /* We can use either hashint8 or hashfloat8 directly */
> > #ifdef HAVE_INT64_TIMESTAMP
> > return hashint8(fcinfo);
> > #else
> > return hashfloat8(fcinfo);
> > #endif
> > }
> > note it's passing fcinfo, not the datum as you do. Same with
> > time_hash.. In fact your version crashes when used because it's
> > dereferencing a int8 as a pointer inside hashfloat8.
> Thanks, didn't notice that fcinfo was used.
>

Hi all,

If helps, I added some regression tests to the lastest patch.

Regards,

--
Fabrízio de Royes Mello
Consultoria/Coaching PostgreSQL
>> Timbira: http://www.timbira.com.br
>> Blog sobre TI: http://fabriziomello.blogspot.com
>> Perfil Linkedin: http://br.linkedin.com/in/fabriziomello
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/fabriziomello