Re: pg_stat_statements and planning time

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_statements and planning time
Date: 2012-03-08 13:31:32
Message-ID: CAEYLb_URfq8yVScaZY2KtVap9=jw_zFMeZXMMswBDY9MoRU99Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 8 March 2012 13:09, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Then again, considering that gettimeofday is kinda
> expensive, I suppose that would have to be optional if we were to have
> it at all.

+1. I'm not opposed to having such a mechanism, but it really ought to
impose exactly no overhead on the common case where we don't
particularly care about plan time.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A.M. 2012-03-08 13:34:53 Re: pg_upgrade --logfile option documentation
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-03-08 13:25:12 Re: Review of pg_archivecleanup -x option patch