Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit

From: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit
Date: 2013-12-18 16:15:16
Message-ID: CAD21AoCAuczb3mqK17N_9j4OiotnV4waXBNagL86fJzBq3RnaQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2013/12/14 0:14 "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>:
>
> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> > I'm not totally satisfied with the name of the GUC, wal_log_hintbits.
>
> Me either; at the very least, it's short an underscore: wal_log_hint_bits
> would be more readable. But how about just "wal_log_hints"?
>

+1 too.
it's readble.

Masahiko Sawada

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-12-18 16:24:29 Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-12-18 16:05:27 Re: [PATCH] SQL assertions prototype