Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Logging WAL when updating hintbit
Date: 2013-12-13 15:14:06
Message-ID: 8760.1386947646@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> writes:
> I'm not totally satisfied with the name of the GUC, wal_log_hintbits.

Me either; at the very least, it's short an underscore: wal_log_hint_bits
would be more readable. But how about just "wal_log_hints"?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dean Rasheed 2013-12-13 15:15:00 Re: ruleutils vs. empty targetlists
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-12-13 15:07:25 Re: ruleutils vs. empty targetlists