From: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
Date: | 2016-07-01 14:00:45 |
Message-ID: | CACjxUsN4XBtG3G5NXm=JTtWBc+t5B9nQq77VV2CQJHxyuDUqyg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 1, 2016 at 2:48 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>>> This PostgreSQL 9.6 open item is past due for your status update. Kindly send
>>> a status update within 24 hours, and include a date for your subsequent status
>>> update. Refer to the policy on open item ownership:
>>> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20160527025039.GA447393@tornado.leadboat.com
>>
>> IIRC Kevin is out of the office this week, so this'll have to wait till
>> next week.
>
> No, he's back since Tuesday - it was last week that he was out. I
> spoke with him yesterday about this and he indicated that he had been
> thinking about it and had several ideas about how to fix it. I'm not
> sure why he hasn't posted here yet.
I have been looking at several possible fixes, and weighing the
pros and cons of each. I expect to post a patch later today.
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-01 14:04:36 | Re: pgsql: Fix crash bug in RestoreSnapshot. |
Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2016-07-01 13:34:52 | Re: pgsql: Fix crash bug in RestoreSnapshot. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-01 14:02:46 | Re: EXISTS clauses not being optimized in the face of 'one time pass' optimizable expressions |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-07-01 13:58:14 | Re: how is the WAL receiver process stopped and restarted when the network connection is broken and then restored? |