Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence

From: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence
Date: 2013-11-05 07:47:24
Message-ID: CABwTF4WE1YsppAJ1Vi7TgQ6m9=DjUZnsQAQFUByF3kK9U+S4Tg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 4, 2013 at 12:20 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> But we're not buying much. A few instructions during postmaster shutdown
> is entirely negligible.
>

The patch is for ClosePostmasterPorts(), which is called from every child
process startup sequence (as $subject also implies), not in postmaster
shutdown. I hope that adds some weight to the argument.

Best regards,
--
Gurjeet Singh gurjeet.singh.im
EnterpriseDB Inc. www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-11-05 07:49:00 Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-11-05 07:45:57 Re: Fast insertion indexes: why no developments