Re: Deprecations in authentication

On Sat, Jan 18, 2014 at 3:59 PM, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

>
> On 01/16/2014 08:01 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us <mailto:
>> tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>> wrote:
>>
>> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net <mailto:magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>>
>>
>> writes:
>> > One thing I noticed - in MSVC, the config parameter "krb5"
>> (equivalent of
>> > the removed --with-krb5) enabled *both* krb5 and gssapi, and
>> there is no
>> > separate config parameter for gssapi. Do we want to rename that
>> one to
>> > "gss", or do we want to keep it as "krb5"? Renaming it would break
>> > otherwise working environments, but it's kind of weird to leave
>> it...
>>
>> +1 for renaming --- anybody who's building with "krb5" and
>> expecting to,
>> you know, actually *get* krb5 would probably rather find out about
>> this
>> change at build time instead of down the road a ways.
>>
>> A compromise position would be to introduce a gss parameter while
>> leaving
>> krb5 in place as a deprecated (perhaps undocumented?) synonym for it.
>> But I think that's basically confusing.
>>
>>
>> Yeah, I'm not sure it actually helps much.
>>
>>
>> Andrew - is this going to cause any issues wrt the buildfarm, by any
>> chance?
>>
>>
> None of my Windows buildfarm members builds with krb5. Mastodon does,
> although it seems to have gone quiet for 16 days (Dave - might be worth a
> check). Probably the result of renaming krb5 would be just that the build
> would proceed without it. From memory I don't thing the config settings are
> sanity checked.
>
> (We need some more, and more modern, Windows buildfarm members.)
>

Thanks, pushed with the rename. That'll keep things less confusing going
forward at least :)

--
Magnus Hagander
Me: http://www.hagander.net/
Work: http://www.redpill-linpro.com/