Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type?
Date: 2014-02-15 02:32:49
Message-ID: CAB7nPqTLKzjvOKES5s1L3SnMeg38PjvPS_iCE46fRcES+xt7vA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Here are updated patches to use pg_lsn instead of pglsn...
Should I register this patch somewhere to avoid having it lost in the void?
Regards,
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-02-15 02:42:26 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Previous Message Greg Stark 2014-02-15 01:25:18 Re: Ctrl+C from sh can shut down daemonized PostgreSQL cluster