| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
| Date: | 2014-02-19 14:24:03 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYSOMgNOg54i3-QVHq_Ny6e+sT5+-QFJQHt9A53tfaOaA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 9:32 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Michael Paquier
> <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> Here are updated patches to use pg_lsn instead of pglsn...
> Should I register this patch somewhere to avoid having it lost in the void?
> Regards,
Well, I committed this, but the buildfarm's deeply unhappy with it.
Apparently the use of GET_8_BYTES() and SET_8_BYTES() is no good on
some platforms... and I'm not sure what to do about that, right
off-hand.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2014-02-19 14:30:04 | Re: should we add a XLogRecPtr/LSN SQL type? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2014-02-19 13:28:33 | Re: WAL Rate Limiting |