Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-11-21 07:19:20
Message-ID: CAB7nPqRCTU8zN4FjYQEk2qVHMCw-vDK2i7XrVGZkVGmNs63FtQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com
> wrote:

> As you may have noticed, I committed this (after some more cleanup). Of
> course, feel free to still review it, and please point out any issues you
> may find.
>

This comment on top of XLogRecordAssemble is not adapted as
page_writes_omitted does not exist. Perhaps this is a remnant of some older
version of the patch?
* If there are any registered buffers, and a full-page image was not taken
* of all them, *page_writes_omitted is set to true. This signals that the
* assembled record is only good for insertion on the assumption that the
* RedoRecPtr and doPageWrites values were up-to-date.
*/
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2014-11-21 07:20:44 Re: alternative model for handling locking in parallel groups
Previous Message Anssi Kääriäinen 2014-11-21 06:58:58 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}