Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: WAL format and API changes (9.5)
Date: 2014-11-21 10:16:38
Message-ID: 546F1106.60802@vmware.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/21/2014 09:19 AM, Michael Paquier wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 21, 2014 at 2:06 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com
>> wrote:
>
>> As you may have noticed, I committed this (after some more cleanup). Of
>> course, feel free to still review it, and please point out any issues you
>> may find.
>>
>
> This comment on top of XLogRecordAssemble is not adapted as
> page_writes_omitted does not exist. Perhaps this is a remnant of some older
> version of the patch?
> * If there are any registered buffers, and a full-page image was not taken
> * of all them, *page_writes_omitted is set to true. This signals that the
> * assembled record is only good for insertion on the assumption that the
> * RedoRecPtr and doPageWrites values were up-to-date.
> */

Yep, fixed thanks.
- Heikki

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-11-21 11:01:50 Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?
Previous Message Abhijit Menon-Sen 2014-11-21 10:11:45 Re: What exactly is our CRC algorithm?