Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]

From: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br>
Subject: Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ]
Date: 2014-08-21 03:00:43
Message-ID: CAA4eK1+_=Va=OjDYkm4rYiY+J_YK3H=0YXDW1MWRh6_ts0Nucw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:08 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 12:55 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 12:59 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
> >> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > a. How about describing w.r.t asynchronous connections
> >> > instead of parallel connections?
> >>
> >> I don't think "asynchronous" is a good choice of word.
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> >>Maybe "simultaneous"?
> >
> > Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?
>
> multiple isn't right, but we could say concurrent.

I also find concurrent more appropriate.
Dilip, could you please change it to concurrent in doc updates,
variables, functions unless you see any objection for the same.

With Regards,
Amit Kapila.
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ashutosh Bapat 2014-08-21 04:21:22 Re: Compute attr_needed for child relations (was Re: inherit support for foreign tables)
Previous Message Sawada Masahiko 2014-08-21 02:43:48 Re: add line number as prompt option to psql