| From: | Dilip kumar <dilip(dot)kumar(at)huawei(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jan Lentfer <Jan(dot)Lentfer(at)web(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Sawada Masahiko <sawada(dot)mshk(at)gmail(dot)com>, Euler Taveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Subject: | Re: TODO : Allow parallel cores to be used by vacuumdb [ WIP ] |
| Date: | 2014-08-21 06:52:31 |
| Message-ID: | 4205E661176A124FAF891E0A6BA913526634C47A@szxeml509-mbs.china.huawei.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 21 August 2014 08:31, Amit Kapila Wrote,
> >>
> > >Not sure. How about *concurrent* or *multiple*?
> >
> >multiple isn't right, but we could say concurrent.
>I also find concurrent more appropriate.
>Dilip, could you please change it to concurrent in doc updates,
>variables, functions unless you see any objection for the same.
Ok, I will take care along with other comments fix..
Regards,
Dilip Kumar
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-08-21 07:06:39 | Re: pg_xlogdump --stats |
| Previous Message | Haribabu Kommi | 2014-08-21 06:47:01 | Parallel Sequence Scan doubts |