Re: A few string fixed

From: Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: A few string fixed
Date: 2013-03-20 16:37:16
Message-ID: CA+mi_8bu7Ps2XjPYB_BVLzZiQ64HMwatuuX4x79cvLh5L-UFTA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 2:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Daniele Varrazzo <daniele(dot)varrazzo(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> while translating the new PostgreSQL 9.3 strings I've found a couple
>> questionable. Patches attached.
>
> Hmm ... I agree with the MultiXactId->MultiXactIds changes, but not with
> this one:
>
>> - errhint("To make the view updatable, provide an unconditional ON DELETE DO INSTEAD rule or an INSTEAD OF DELETE trigger.")));
>> + errhint("To make the view deletable, provide an unconditional ON DELETE DO INSTEAD rule or an INSTEAD OF DELETE trigger.")));
>
> We use the phrase "updatable view", we don't say "deletable view"
> (and this usage is also found in the SQL standard). We could possibly
> make the message say "To make the view updatable in this way", or
> "... for this purpose", but that seems a bit long-winded to me.

Ok, I'd just thought it was a pasto.

-- Daniele

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hadi Moshayedi 2013-03-20 16:44:54 Re: Improving avg performance for numeric
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-03-20 16:30:32 Re: pg_upgrade segfaults when given an invalid PGSERVICE value