Re: tracking commit timestamps

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jaime(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: tracking commit timestamps
Date: 2014-11-11 16:10:47
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLa5H5tOBoT+23cv+N=L3qPZj1ZkEvbyHf0+AVYLSOAMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-www

On 4 November 2014 08:23, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:

>> 6) Shouldn't any value update of track_commit_timestamp be tracked in
>> XLogReportParameters? That's thinking about making the commit timestamp
>> available on standbys as well..
>
> Yes, it should.

Agree committs should be able to run on standby, but it seems possible
to do that without it running on the master. The two should be
unconnected.

Not sure why we'd want to have parameter changes on master reported?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2014-11-11 16:12:20 Re: 9.4RC1 next week
Previous Message Andres Freund 2014-11-11 16:01:15 Re: 9.4RC1 next week

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-11-11 16:19:02 Re: tracking commit timestamps
Previous Message Steve Singer 2014-11-10 16:58:12 Re: tracking commit timestamps