Re: pg_shmem_allocations view

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_shmem_allocations view
Date: 2014-05-06 12:35:25
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLMBw_jibSHkB_uRpRTLK9_eRowk+DQUKtVUr=K8N0+9w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 6 May 2014 13:06, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:

> The best scheme will depend on how the segments
> are used. Best to leave it to the extension author.

+1

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-05-06 12:43:34 possible dsm bug in dsm_attach()
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2014-05-06 12:19:22 Re: [PATCH] Fix use of free in walsender error handling after a sysid mismatch.