| From: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_shmem_allocations view |
| Date: | 2014-05-06 12:06:30 |
| Message-ID: | 5368D046.70301@vmware.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 05/06/2014 02:59 PM, Robert Haas wrote:
>> >Why would we call multiple segments the same thing??
> It's not clear to me how someone is going to intelligently name
> multiple segments used by the same extension. Maybe they'll give them
> all the same name. Maybe they'll name them all extension_name.pid.
> More than likely, different extensions will use different conventions.
> :-(
That seems sensible to me. The best scheme will depend on how the
segments are used. Best to leave it to the extension author.
- Heikki
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2014-05-06 12:19:22 | Re: [PATCH] Fix use of free in walsender error handling after a sysid mismatch. |
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2014-05-06 12:05:15 | Re: Removing xloginsert_slots? |