Re: Sequence Access Method WIP

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Sequence Access Method WIP
Date: 2013-11-25 10:00:09
Message-ID: CA+U5nMLG+X8TcsmZPO9w3-1s14C=1xJhtSYYdJa1yWyOU9Yy3w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 25 November 2013 04:01, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com> wrote:

> The proposed changes to alloc() would still suffer from all the problems
> that I complained about. Adding a new API alongside doesn't help with that.

You made two proposals. I suggested implementing both.

What would you have me do?

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-11-25 11:47:12 Re: Errors on missing pg_subtrans/ files with 9.3
Previous Message Rajeev rastogi 2013-11-25 09:55:35 Re: COPY table FROM STDIN doesn't show count tag