Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "masao(dot)fujii" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [REVIEW] pg_last_xact_insert_timestamp
Date: 2011-10-03 20:25:01
Message-ID: CA+U5nML9vbGdDqKhDA3GpZ=iB_c6dq_46jEPkR0XgnSR3rQxbw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 8:07 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Sorry, but I still don't really think it's fair to say that you've
> proposed a solution to this problem.  Or if you have, neither I nor
> Fujii Masao understand that proposal well enough to decide whether we
> like it.

Arguing between trenches doesn't really get us anywhere.

As ever, when someone claims to have a better solution then it is up
to them to prove that is the case.

--
 Simon Riggs                   http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
 PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-10-03 20:28:53 Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories
Previous Message Alvaro Herrera 2011-10-03 20:22:03 Re: Bug with pg_ctl -w/wait and config-only directories