Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}

From: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Subject: Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Date: 2014-10-27 18:12:23
Message-ID: CA+U5nMKvJAEPLkqZzvs1ZKUO=N5HcXbSmUmWjxvH0Shau+gYjQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 27 October 2014 17:44, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:

> I did a lot of copy-editing to the Wiki page yesterday. There are
> actually few clear open items now:
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/UPSERT#Open_Items

I've read this page.

Please do these things, both of which have been requested multiple times...

1. Take the specific docs that relate to the patch and put them in one
place, so that everybody can read and understand and agree the
behaviour of the patch. So that someone reading that can see *exactly*
what is being proposed, not read through pages of other unchanged
material hoping to catch the few points that really differ.

2. Replace CONFLICTING() with what I have asked for in earlier posts.
The request is not repeated again, to avoid confusion.

--
Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2014-10-27 18:39:11 Re: jsonb generator functions
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2014-10-27 17:44:59 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}