Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [9.3 doc fix] clarification of Solaris versions
Date: 2013-08-26 18:34:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmobrDmMY+MOZLapdMXPvnKrZDM5OSvF2Hn=Epx_4eGY96Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:30 AM, MauMau <maumau307(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> One of my colleagues, who is relatively new to PostgreSQL, asked me if
> PostgreSQL supports Solaris 11. The reason why he had this question is that
> the following page says "Solaris 10" instead of "Solaris 10 and later".
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/devel/static/kernel-resources.html
>
> So, I suggest this tiny modification to avoid misunderstanding. In
> addition, I suggest removing references to OpenSolaris because OpenSolaris
> is already discontinued.
>
> I'm attaching one patch file. Could you commit this change?

Just because OpenSolaris is discontinued doesn't mean we don't support
it. It looks like it has been unsupported for ~3 years at this point
- not sure if that is long enough to remove the documentation
reference.

The patch looks otherwise sensible, but I note that we don't actually
have any Buildfarm members running Solaris > 10. So do we know for
sure that everything works there? Should we try to get one set up
before claiming we support the platform?

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2013-08-26 18:45:46 Re: pg_system_identifier()
Previous Message Robert Haas 2013-08-26 18:28:32 Re: ereport documentation patch