Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Shave a few instructions from child-process startup sequence
Date: 2013-11-27 14:12:06
Message-ID: CA+TgmobQ0apmp=3+e5s2OSNPF=J6Ff=fFLomEHuqDBrYwD4MRg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 10:12 PM, Gurjeet Singh <gurjeet(at)singh(dot)im> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 9:42 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>
>> src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:2255: indent with spaces.
>> + else
>> src/backend/postmaster/postmaster.c:2267: indent with spaces.
>> + break
>
>
> Not sure how that happened! Attached is the updated patch.

This is a performance patch, so it should come with benchmark results
demonstrating that it accomplishes its intended purpose. I don't see
any.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pavel Stehule 2013-11-27 14:14:35 Re: new unicode table border styles for psql
Previous Message Kevin Grittner 2013-11-27 14:05:13 Re: [GENERAL] pg_upgrade ?deficiency