Re: Inefficient barriers on solaris with sun cc

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Inefficient barriers on solaris with sun cc
Date: 2014-09-26 12:39:38
Message-ID: CA+TgmobKFAJdXm3=kAU+z0FaheadiWgCutNxCizCd9kAyJLfGQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Oskari Saarenmaa <os(at)ohmu(dot)fi> wrote:
> 25.09.2014, 16:34, Andres Freund kirjoitti:
>> Binaries compiled on solaris using sun studio cc currently don't have
>> compiler and memory barriers implemented. That means we fall back to
>> relatively slow generic implementations for those. Especially compiler,
>> read, write barriers will be much slower than necessary (since they all
>> just need to prevent compiler reordering as both sparc and x86 are run
>> in TSO mode under solaris).
>
> Attached patch implements compiler and memory barriers for Solaris Studio
> based on documentation at
> http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E18659_01/html/821-1383/gjzmf.html
>
> I defined read and write barriers as acquire and release barriers instead of
> pure read and write ones as that's what other platforms appear to do.

So you think a read barrier is the same thing as an acquire barrier
and a write barrier is the same as a release barrier? That would be
surprising. It's certainly not true in general.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2014-09-26 12:40:47 Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE}
Previous Message Oskari Saarenmaa 2014-09-26 12:36:02 Re: Inefficient barriers on solaris with sun cc