| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marti Raudsepp <marti(at)juffo(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view |
| Date: | 2019-11-15 19:43:09 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoatV1iTeo_jdixJv0cuDHwzi3ysJhw+CUDOtxf7vToOOA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 7:01 PM Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> Here's a rebased version. I remember why I didn't call the column
> "offset" (as Michael complained about upthread), it's a keyword...
This never got applied, and that annoyed me again today, so here's a
new version that I've whacked around somewhat and propose to commit. I
ripped out the stuff pertaining to dynamic shared memory segments,
both because I think it might need some more thought and discussion,
and because the part the pertains to the main shared memory segment is
the part I keep wishing we had. We can add that other part later if
we're all agreed on it, but let's go ahead and add this part now.
Other things I changed:
- Doc edits.
- Added REVOKE statements as proposed by Michael (and I agree).
- Can't patch pg_proc.h any more, gotta patch pg_proc.dat.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| 0001-Add-a-pg_shmem_allocations-view.patch | application/octet-stream | 9.2 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2019-11-15 19:58:22 | Re: [HACKERS] pg_shmem_allocations view |
| Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2019-11-15 19:14:17 | Re: jsonb_set() strictness considered harmful to data |