Re: Marginal performance improvement for fast-path locking

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Marginal performance improvement for fast-path locking
Date: 2013-11-28 21:19:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmoaC03yc+0jxaQ2DWSa7-agG7BKwvxwAkspN=jufHD8C8w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 3:09 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> But I don't think it'll hurt anything. If you can prove that it
>> actually helps something, I'll buy you a glass of wine. :-)
>
> FWIW, I did try benchmarking this using "pgbench -S -c 10 -M prepared".
> If there's any difference, it's below the noise floor. (I see about
> 0.2% or so run-to-run variation even without changing anything.)

No wine for you.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2013-11-28 21:23:53 Re: new unicode table border styles for psql
Previous Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-11-28 21:12:04 Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)