Re: Marginal performance improvement for fast-path locking

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Marginal performance improvement for fast-path locking
Date: 2013-11-28 20:09:07
Message-ID: 31231.1385669347@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> But I don't think it'll hurt anything. If you can prove that it
> actually helps something, I'll buy you a glass of wine. :-)

FWIW, I did try benchmarking this using "pgbench -S -c 10 -M prepared".
If there's any difference, it's below the noise floor. (I see about
0.2% or so run-to-run variation even without changing anything.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kohei KaiGai 2013-11-28 21:12:04 Re: Custom Scan APIs (Re: Custom Plan node)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2013-11-28 19:35:23 Re: lock on object is already held