Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf
Date: 2011-09-15 11:04:43
Message-ID: CA+TgmoZG6XxAnadSyLXOmn9EpU44QF4BT7oxALS+EYDP-hb_tg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 5:58 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> Alternatively, we could just forget about the whole thing and move
> everything to postgresql.conf and treat recovery.conf as a simple empty
> signal file.  I don't know if that's necessarily better.

Seems like it might be simpler.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-09-15 12:03:09 Re: Use of literal in SGML docs
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2011-09-15 10:58:21 Re: unite recovery.conf and postgresql.conf