Re: Extensions makefiles - coverage

On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Ronan Dunklau <rdunklau(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I was having trouble figuring how to use the coverage targets when
> using an extension.
> I am using approximatively the layout that was proposed here:
> http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/51BB1B6E.2070705@dunslane.net
> It looks like everything is hard-coded to take the source and the
> gcda, gcno files in the base directory, but these files lay in a src
> directory with the proposed layout.
>
> It may be better to base the .gcda file discovery on the OBJS
> variables when using PGXS.
>
> Please find attached a small patch that implements this. There is
> probably a better way than the redundant rm $(gcda_files) / rm *.gcda
> to cleanup the generated files.
>
> With the attached patch, the following targets seem to have the same
> behaviour as on the current HEAD, both on the whole tree and on
> individual contrib modules:
>
> - coverage-html
> - clean
> - coverage-clean
> - clean-coverage
>
> I noticed that make clean leaves gcda and gcov files on the current
> HEAD, and this is no different with the given patch.
>
> I also tested it against several pgxn extensions, and it seems to work fine.

You can ensure that your patch doesn't get forgotten about by adding it here:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company