Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook
Date: 2013-04-26 12:51:23
Message-ID: CA+TgmoY6btCfYghkLNBDFswQDRdj7s6jk-B6+1W_L9khMC5X4g@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I have to admit I don't see the point. None of those values is particularly
> interesting to anybody without implementation level knowledge and those
> will likely deal with them just fine. And I find the version with the
> shorter names far quicker to read.
> The clarity win here doesn't seem to be worth the price of potentially
> breaking some tools.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2013-04-26 12:58:48 Re: Recovery target 'immediate'
Previous Message Simon Riggs 2013-04-26 12:41:10 Re: Recovery target 'immediate'