| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pg_controldata gobbledygook |
| Date: | 2013-05-02 14:31:27 |
| Message-ID: | 20130502143127.GC23555@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 08:51:23AM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 5:08 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> > I have to admit I don't see the point. None of those values is particularly
> > interesting to anybody without implementation level knowledge and those
> > will likely deal with them just fine. And I find the version with the
> > shorter names far quicker to read.
> > The clarity win here doesn't seem to be worth the price of potentially
> > breaking some tools.
>
> +1.
FYI, pg_upgrade would certainly have to be updated to handle this
change.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ It's impossible for everything to be true. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Fetter | 2013-05-02 14:33:04 | Re: GSOC13 proposal - extend RETURNING syntax |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2013-05-02 14:27:17 | Re: Change to pg_test_fsync output |