Re: pgbench \for or similar loop

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Merlin Moncure <mmoncure(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgbench \for or similar loop
Date: 2011-04-20 19:23:44
Message-ID: BANLkTiktfyc9bTgnC4RZ4uyMzaPo6_tN-A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:23 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 02:12:25PM -0400, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 20, 2011 at 2:10 PM, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
>> > It is precisely this kind of issue that leads me to believe it would
>> > be counter-productive to come up with any client-specific hacks.
>>
>> These definitional issues exist on the server, too, and weren't
>> considered early enough there either.
>>
>> Preventing people from working on the things they care about is not a
>> good idea.  There is no guarantee they will work on the things you
>> care about instead.  They may just do nothing.
>
> We have situations where the "fix it in one spot" approach has
> resulted in real, serious problems.  Try explaining to someone new to
> the project why pg_dump and pg_dumpall are separate programs, for
> example.

True, but I thought I had addressed that point fairly thoroughly in my
various replies.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2011-04-20 19:34:46 Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-04-20 19:22:24 Re: Formatting Curmudgeons WAS: MMAP Buffers