Re: gcc 4.6 and hot standby

From: Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
Subject: Re: gcc 4.6 and hot standby
Date: 2011-06-10 20:51:42
Message-ID: BANLkTi=c+_a3Baa5LUfdCBOWo9u0BU_BMQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 14:24, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:

>> Hrm, Couldn't we change all the references to tmpRecPtr to use RecPtr
>> instead? (Except of course where we assign RecPtr = &tmpRecPtr); I
>> think that would make the code look a lot less confused. Something
>> like the attached?
>
> Yeah, we could do that too; slightly modified version of your change
> included in the attached.

A cassert enabled build seems to be working, ill leave it running over
the weekend...

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dan Ports 2011-06-10 21:38:46 Re: Small SSI issues
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-06-10 20:24:11 Re: gcc 4.6 and hot standby