From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |
Date: | 2011-02-10 17:02:58 |
Message-ID: | AANLkTinrzwbAapmtmxr1_8eOXhUcgPWSFCuH5Gt2qkqf@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 11:45 AM, Kevin Grittner
<Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> wrote:
> Well, I'm comfortable digging in my heels against doing *lame* hints
> just because "it's what all the other kids are doing," which I think
> is the only thing which would have satisfied the OP on this thread.
> From both on-list posts and ones exchanged off-list with me, it
> seems he was stubbornly resistant to properly tuning the server to
> see if any problems remained, or posting particular problems to see
> how they would be most effectively handled in PostgreSQL. We
> obviously can't be drawn into dumb approaches because of
> ill-informed demands like that.
Nor was I proposing any such thing. But that doesn't make "we don't
want hints" an accurate statement. Despite the impression that OP
went away with, the real situation is a lot more nuanced than that,
and the statement on the Todo list gives the wrong impression, IMHO.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-10 17:04:19 | Re: Range Types (catversion.h) |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-10 17:01:42 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shaun Thomas | 2011-02-10 17:06:42 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-02-10 17:01:42 | Re: Why we don't want hints Was: Slow count(*) again... |