Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?

From: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_restore should accept multiple -t switches?
Date: 2010-08-11 04:35:20
Message-ID: AANLkTingQyZ9ED_zo9DN+CqHWs515gq7WVF0Rwpzwc8q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Is it worth allowing pg_restore to accept multiple -t
>> switches as well as pg_dump?
>
> It's on the TODO list already, no?

Thanks! I found it on the list and understood there are other many
restrictions in pg_restore's -t switch.

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao
NIPPON TELEGRAPH AND TELEPHONE CORPORATION
NTT Open Source Software Center

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-11 04:42:31 Regression tests versus the buildfarm environment
Previous Message Greg Smith 2010-08-11 04:34:05 Re: Patch to show individual statement latencies in pgbench output