Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers
Date: 2011-01-23 02:26:42
Message-ID: AANLkTinU=-8X6cnf1R=9-VQ389cet9TT39aZbMNnBQYQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 9:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> I'm going with hacks.  Any API that requires you to print to a string
>> so you can turn around and immediately convert it back to an integer
>> is not too swift.
>
> Oh, you're complaining about SetConfigOption, not the assign hooks.

I was actually complaining about the latter, and then switched gears
to the former. I'm an equal-opportunity complainer today, I guess...

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2011-01-23 02:31:57 Re: Bug in pg_describe_object, patch v2
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-01-23 02:24:48 Re: auto-sizing wal_buffers